Tag
writing techniques
12 posts
- 02TuesdayMain Essay·
For years, I ended every piece with 'In summary'—until heatmaps proved readers bounced on that exact word, remembering nothing.
The 'In Summary' Trap in Conclusions: Sealing Text with a Portable Tool, Not a Photocopy
Turning your conclusion into an index of what was just read triggers an immediate exit. How to abandon summary recaps in analytical writing and seal your piece with one conditional, portable rule.
Read the piece →
- 01MondayOpening·
For years, I ended pieces with 'In summary...' rehashing the three points I had just made. The final paragraph is not a backward-looking transcript—it is a single tool handed to the reader on their way out.
The Death of 'In Summary': Sealing the Final Paragraph with a Single-Sentence Tool
Concluding paragraphs that start with 'In summary' kill momentum. A strong ending isn't a recap of old arguments; it's a single transferable tool readers can take to their desks.
Read the piece →
- 05FridayFramework·
For years, I shortened paragraphs merely by hunting down adjectives; the word count dropped, but the heaviness never lifted. The real task isn't deleting words—it's identifying the paragraph's load-bearing pillar and letting go of every defensive safeguard.
The 300-to-3 Sentence Matrix: 3 Filters That Separate Pillars from Clutter
For years, we believed shortening paragraphs meant trimming adjectives. Yet what truly lightens a text isn't deleting words—it's stripping away defensive hedges and distilling the paragraph into three load-bearing sentences.
Read the piece →
- 06SaturdayDifferent Angle·
In a guide where I slapped an example onto every abstract sentence, word count doubled and readership dropped—because examples carry a cost, and sometimes an abstract sentence gets the job done faster.
Giving Examples Isn't Always Right: When "Make It Concrete" Fails
For years, I attached an example to every abstract sentence; in one onboarding guide, this reflex doubled the length and tanked completion rates. Here are three conditions where examples backfire and a single decision test for the editing desk.
Read the piece →
- 01MondayOpening·
I wrote the sentence "quality content matters" hundreds of times—and it was so uncontestably true that it told nobody anything.
An Abstract Sentence Is a Promise, a Scene Is Proof: Why I Deleted "Quality Content Matters"
For years, I wrote true but invisible sentences like "quality content matters"; no one paused, no one quoted them. Here is what changed when I replaced an abstract claim with a single concrete scene—and how I bloated my prose when I tried to turn every sentence into one.
Read the piece →
- 03WednesdayData·
I thought I was showcasing my strongest evidence in an indented block; scroll data showed readers sprinting right past the storefront.
Skipped Evidence: What Happens to Blockquotes When 79% of Readers Scan?
According to Jakob Nielsen's 1997 research, 79% of web users scan rather than read—and the indented blockquote is the easiest element for scanning eyes to skip. We examine, with workshop honesty, when a single-sentence bridge succeeds and when it bloats the text into syntax collapse.
Read the piece →
- 06SaturdayDifferent Angle·
For years, I relied on a massive arsenal of transition words like "however," "on the other hand," and "in addition" to make my prose flow.
The Conjunction Trap: The Illusion of Creating Flow with "Also"
For years, I used an arsenal of conjunctions to stitch paragraphs together. As it turns out, every "also" was just a lazy band-aid hiding a hole in the structure.
Read the piece →
- 03WednesdayData·
For years, I thought stitching paragraphs together with transitions like 'in addition' and 'moreover' made my prose smooth; until heatmaps showed readers braking at these mechanical joints and bouncing off the page.
Transition Laziness: Why 'Also' and 'In Addition' Drive Readers Away
For years, I believed stitching paragraphs together with mechanical transitions like 'in addition' made my writing flow. That was until data proved these words actually disrupt the reader's rhythm.
Read the piece →
- 06SaturdayDifferent Angle·
If you entrust a sentence's impact to adjectives, you are lying to your reader.
The Fallacy of Conveying Emotion with Adjectives: Why Verbs Are the Engine of Writing
We debunk the myth that good writing relies on heavy adjective descriptions. The true load-bearing column of a text is not adjectives dictating what the reader should feel, but strong verbs showing the action.
Read the piece →
- 04ThursdayCase Study·
For years I treated opening paragraphs like literary puzzles—and lost readers in the first 15 seconds.
The High Cost of Building Mystery in Intros: Basecamp’s ‘Get to the Point’ Revolution
Moving past the common writer's trap of manufacturing suspense in intros, we explore Basecamp's clarity-driven conversion lessons on laying your cards on the table from sentence one.
Read the piece →
- 03WednesdayData·
For years, I wrote intro paragraphs like literary riddles, believing I was hooking reader curiosity. Turns out, I was showing over 60% of my readers the door within the first 5 seconds.
Playing the Mystery Card in Your Intro: The Sneaky Mistake Behind 60% Bounce Rates
For years, I wrote intro paragraphs like literary riddles, believing I was hooking reader curiosity. Turns out, I was showing more than half of my readers the door within the first 5 seconds.
Read the piece →
- 02TuesdayMain Essay·
For years, I designed opening paragraphs like cinema movies: setting the mood first, deepening the mystery, and saving the key takeaway for the third paragraph. The result? Readers got bored by line two and closed the tab.
The 'Inverted Pyramid' Fallacy in Intros: Hooking Readers with First-Sentence Delivery, Not Mystery
For years, I crafted introductions like cinematic openings and lost readers in droves. Now I cut straight to the chase and put the promise on the table in the first 15 words.
Read the piece →